Significant Motifs in a Contemporary Television Series
Keywords:TV series, sign, motif, meaning, “Game of Thrones”
In this article, we concentrate our attention around some topics which are intrinsically contingent to the state of mind of the contemporary TV series production consumer. Here we try to comprehend some common features, motifs, signs, the meaning of which is not certain; nevertheless, they are present in almost every TV series of our times. We attempt at tracing some significant motifs in the final seasons of such different TV series products as the “Game of Thrones”, “Vikings”, and Norwegian “Okkupert”. The first of them belongs to the genre of fantasy, the second to the historical reconstruction, and the third one is a spurious attempt at modelling the near future where Russia occupies Norway. Nevertheless, we see some motifs, both visual and verbal, permeating all the three TV series worlds.
Let us enumerate some of them. Their range extends from the maxims of political wisdom to simple heathen mythological symbols (e.g. ravens). In our humble opinion, those signs are almost indexal. Their meaning is void of deepness; signs simply refer to other signs of the outer reality, so we have a reference point to start with. So we have some grounds to believe their message.
First of all, their range comprises basic fears of contemporary reality. It does not matter in what imaginary world we find them. Fantasy, as well as pseudo-history, refers to the actual challenges of today as effectively as the TV series situated in. We have political fears, such as Russian invasion, and the TV series “Vikings” reflects it as well as the Norwegian “Okkupert”. We have ecological fears, and the “Game of Thrones” reflects them as well. We have epidemiological fears, but the “Game of Thrones” copes with them easily.
We regard this type of signs or motifs as necessary points of attraction, hints of reality, which make identification possible.
The TV series analyzed here were heavily criticized by Facebook users, especially the 8th season of the “Game of Thrones”. Nevertheless, we can make precisely these Facebook activities a criterion of taking a TV series into account as important. They produce memes and give people useful opportunities to comment such actual events as elections or other political activities through them. Significant motifs which are recognizable in many contemporary contexts facilitate this use of TV series as a comment to reality.
Manuscript received 01.05.2020
Besedin, Aleksandr. 2018. “Neverbalnye edementy kinoteksta v semiozise vlasti.” Vestnik Baltiyskogo federalnogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Filologiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya 2:32–41 [in Russian].
Cerrino, Mariangela. 2002. Rasna. La saga del popolo Etrusco. Milano.
Eco, Umberto. 1972. Towards a Semiotic Inquiry into the Television Message. Working Papers in Cultural Studies. 2.
Eco, Umberto. 1998. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura [The Absent Structure]. Saint Petersburg: Petropolis [in Russian].
Fathallah, Judith. 2017. Fanfiction and the Author: How fanfic changes popular cultural texts, 101–155. Amsterdam Univ. Press.
Kalishchuk, R. 2007. “Ornamental-sign motives in painting culture Tripillya-Kukuteni.” Visnyk Kharkivskoyi derzhavnoyi akademiyi dyzaynu i mystetstv [Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts]. Mystetstvoznavstvo. Arkhitektura 8:64–72 [in Ukrainian].
Laugier, Sandra. 2018. “Spoilers, Twists and Dragons.” In Stories. Screen Narrative in the Digital Age, 143–152. Amsterdam Univ. Press.
Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Nöth, Winfried. 1995. Panorama da semiotica. Sao Paulo: Annablume.
Sobutsky, Mykhailo. 2016. “Ethical Choice Made by a Hero of a Serial: A Psychoanalytical Approach.” NaUKMA Research Papers. Theory and History of Culture 179:57–63. http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9371 [in Ukrainian].
Sobutsky, Mykhailo. 2017. “Serial Products and the Question of Reference.” Magisterium. Culturology 68:32–5. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Magisterium_kul_2017_68_8 [in Ukrainian].
Storey, John. 2005. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. An Introduction. Kharkiv: Akta [in Ukrainian].
Copyright (c) 2020 Mykhailo Sobutsky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Author(s) retain copyright under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt the work (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with an acknowledgement of the work's attribution.
b) The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
c) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. (See Self-Archiving Policy).
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).