In Memoria: Problematic Fields of Cultural Archaeology in the Context of Leo Klein’s Observations
Keywords:anthropology, historical culturology, cultural history, cultural archaeology, prehistory, applied field, interdisciplinary research, Leo Klein
Up to nowadays, archaeology is considered to be a “history assistant”, tied to the linked aim and subject field, and the ancientries themselves are mostly just catalogued and typologized. It was obvious to Professor Leo Klein that ancient culture should be studied not by archaeology, requiring a fundamentally different methodology. Unfortunately, in November 2019, this outstanding researcher stopped his creative path, leaving behind many wise observations. This essay in memory of Lev Samuilovich substantiates his methodological observations around archaeology, history and culture.
While traditional history is based on written evidences and is interested in individual events, the archaeologist analyzes the exact circumstances under which and how these events occurred. In particular, the comparison of archaeology with criminology is accurate. Similarly, historical culturology deals with “clues”: it analyzes cultural fragments, layered in time and space echoes of the former everyday life, disassembling which, tries to carry out a certain reconstruction – not of the material component, but rather of information. For cultural (pre-)history, culture appears as a materialized (“objected”) form of the mass consciousness embodiment.
Leo Klein certainly accepted the fundamental role of the theory of culture and just distinguished it from the very concept of “culturology”, which as of the mid-nineties he considered as an artificial fiction. However, in the twenty years later texts we do not find such statements. In a broader context, the researcher dreamed of a disciplines ensemble capable of shedding light on various aspects of the past through a natural experience exchange. The ideal embodiment of which the professor considered to be a single institutional department: the Faculty of Anthropology, where the Archaeology Department would be adjacent to the Departments of Anthropology, Ethnography, Cultural Studies, Museum Studies, Primitive and Ancient Art, Theoretical Linguistics, Historical Geography, etc.
Manuscript received 10.09.2020
Akopyan, Karen. 2005. “Istoricheskaya kulturologiya kak samostoyatelnaya distsiplіna.” Vestnik VyatGGU 13:22–34 [in Russian].
Burke, Peter. 2016. What is Cultural History?, trans. I. Polonskaia. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki [in Russian].
Bondarets, Oksana. 2018. “Metodolohichni aspekty vyvchennia arkheolohichnykh pamiatok v konteksti kulturolohii.” In Kulturolohiia: Mohylianska shkola [Cultural Studies: Mohylianska School], edited by M. A. Sobutsky, D. O. Korol, Yu. V. Dzhulay, 99–129. Kyiv: FOP Filiuk O. http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/15233 [in Ukrainian].
Flier, Andrei. 1999. “Kultura kak smysl istorii.” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost 6:150–9 [in Russian].
Flier, Andrei. 2011. “Istoricheskaya kulturologiya kak oblast znaniya.” Journal of Cultural Research 2(4). http://www.cr-journal.ru/rus/journals/56.html [in Russian].
Flier, Andrei. 2012. “Istoriya obshchestva – istoriya kultury –istoricheskaya kulturologiya.” Vestnik MGUKI 6(50):14–21 [in Russian].
Ikonnikova, Svetlana. 2009. “Arkheologiya i kulturologiya: vzaimosvyaz i dialog.” In Problemy kulturogeneza i kulturnogo naslediya: Sbornik statey k 80-letiyu Vadima Mikhaylovicha Massona, 16–24. Saint Petersburg: Info Ol [in Russian].
Ikonnikova, Svetlana. 2012. “Kontury i perspektivy istoricheskoy kulturologii.” Vestnik SPbGUKI 1(10):6–14 [in Russian].
Kholyushkin, Yuriy, Yevgeniy Vityaev, and Vitaliy Kostin. 2013. “Kulturologicheskaya arkheologiya.” In Zadachi arkheologii i metody ikh resheniya, 31–3. Novosibirsk: Manuskript. (Informatsionnye tekhnologii v gumanitarnykh issledovaniyakh; Issue 18) [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 1998. “Kulturolog – eto kto?” In Kulturologiya kak ona est i kak ey byt, edited by L. Moreva, 277–82. Saint Petersburg [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 1999. “Funktsii arkheologicheskoy teorii.” Stratum plus 3:8–25 [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2001. Printsipy arkheologii. Saint Petersburg: Belveder [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2004. Vvedenie v teoreticheskuyu arkheologiyu. 1. Metaarkheologiya. Saint Petersburg: Belveder [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2010. Trudno byt Kleinom: Avtobiografiia v monologakh i dialogakh. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2013. “Teoreticheskaya orientatsiya polskoy arkheologii” [retsenziya]. Rossiyskiy arkheologicheskiy ezhegodnik 3:685–91 [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2015-16. “Razmyshleniya o teoreticheskoy rabote v arkheologii (otklik na statyu Ya. A. Shera).” Rossiyskiy arkheologicheskiy ezhegodnik 5–6:6–16 [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2016. Ob idealnoy srede dlya prepodavaniya arkheologii. Rech prof. L. S. Kleyna na yubilee kafedry arkheologii Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta 19.10.2016. genofond article No 34990. http://genofond.rf/?page_id=11516 [in Russian].
Klein, Leo. 2018. Kultura i evolyutsiya: teoreticheskie issledovaniya. Saint Petersburg: Yevraziya [in Russian].
Markina, Nadezhda. 2017. Deviat desiatiletii Kleina. http://генофонд.рф/?page_id=27502 [in Russian].
Palmer, Marilyn. 2014. “Industrial Archaeology.” In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, edited by C. Smith, 3853–62. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1769
Parakhonsky, Borys. 2000. “Methodological Aspects of Culture Studies.” Magisterium. Culturology 5:4–11. http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/13911/Parakhonskyi_Metodolohichni_aspekty_kulturolohii.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].
Pustovalov, Serhii. 2019. “Epokha L. S. Kleina.” Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts Series in Museology and Monumental Studies 2(2):167–71. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-7918.104.22.1689.188481 [in Ukrainian].
Raab, L. Mark. 1980-81. “Do Cultural Explanations of the past Have a Future?” North American Archaeologist 2(4):331–43.
Shchavelev, Sergey. 2019. “Arkheolog na pozitsii kulturologa: imeet pravo? (rets.: Kleyn L. S. Kultura i evolyutsiya.
Teoreticheskie issledovaniya. SPb.: Yevraziya, 2018. 316 s.).” Pervobytnaya arkheologiya. Zhurnal mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy 2:140–52 [in Russian].
Copyright (c) 2020 Denys Korol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Author(s) retain copyright under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt the work (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with an acknowledgement of the work's attribution.
b) The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
c) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. (See Self-Archiving Policy).
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).